Logo

Get Updates

Subscribe to receive instant notifications for new study materials and important updates.

Home» class 9»Democratic Politics» Chapter 3: Electoral Politics

Chinappa was convicted for torturing his wife for dowry. Satbi... - Democratic Politics

Question

Chinappa was convicted for torturing his wife for dowry. Satbir was held guilty of practicing untouchability. The court did not allow either of them to contest elections. Does this decision go against the principles of democratic elections?

Answer

No, this decision does not go against the principles of democratic elections.

Reasons:

  1. Integrity of Democracy: To ensure a healthy democracy, it is necessary to keep the political system clean. Allowing people with serious criminal records to contest would lead to the criminalization of politics.

  2. Violation of Basic Values: Satbir was guilty of practicing untouchability, which is a direct violation of the Constitutional right to equality. A person who does not respect the basic rights of citizens is unfit to represent them.

  3. Legal Restrictions: While every citizen has the right to contest, the law imposes reasonable restrictions to prevent individuals who have committed serious crimes (like dowry torture) from holding public office, as they are expected to be role models for society.

Related Questions

VIEW ALL SOLUTIONS

Chapter Info

Subject: Democratic Politics
Class: class 9
Chapter 3: Electoral Politics
Medium: English Medium